Chenfan Electric
EN
Send drawing

ARTICLETechnical article

Reactor Reignition: Terminal Peak Versus Turn Stress

  • Chenfan Power

Current chopping and reignition are distinct parts of a reactor switching event. Chopping interrupts current before its natural zero and releases stored energy into the connected capacitances. Reignition restores a conducting path after dielectric recovery has begun, producing another fast transient. [1]

Define the breaker, reactor, connecting bus or cable and nearby capacitances. Record the event waveform rather than describing it with one overvoltage factor. A winding’s internal voltage distribution depends on rise time and frequency content as well as crest value.

Reactor Reignition: Terminal Peak Versus Turn Stress: technical review table
First article table, reproduced without adding or changing values. See the article for assumptions and application boundaries.

Track the stress through three boundaries

BoundaryQuantity retainedQuestion
Breaker eventChopping, reignition times and conducting statesWhat launched each transient?
Reactor terminalFull voltage waveform and connection modelWhat reached the winding?
Winding interiorTurn/section voltage distributionWhich insulation path sees the highest stress?

Use energy only as a screening check

For a lossless lumped screen with zero initial capacitor voltage and complete exchange, ½LI² = ½CVpk²; both sides are joules. This is an energy scale. With nonzero initial capacitor voltage, use the initial and final stored energies, not ½C times a voltage increment squared. Network coupling, damping and the breaker determine the actual waveform.

Popov and colleagues measured and modelled nonuniform fast-transient voltages within transformer windings. [2] Applying that principle to a reactor requires its own distributed winding parameters; it does not transfer their transformer’s stresses. Terminal crest and highest interturn stress must both be retained.

Record simultaneous terminal, section and turn-pair voltages from the reactor model so that peaks at different instants cannot be combined into a fictitious distribution.

Separate terminal peak from turn concentration

Assumptions: a specified switching-model instant has 100 kV across a 100-turn reactor and 20 kV across its first five turn intervals. Uniform sharing suggests 1 kV/turn, but those first intervals average 4 kV/turn, so at least one reaches 4 kV or more. An assumed 3 kV turn-interval operating-stress ceiling therefore fails by at least 1 kV, even though uniform division appears to pass. Hold that turn-insulation assignment and validate the actual winding response and protective scheme; the assumed inputs are not measured reactor data.

References

  1. H. Nie et al., Breaking Overvoltage of Dry-Type Air-Core Shunt Reactors and Its Cumulative Effect on the Interturn Insulation, IEEE Access 7, 55707–55720, 2019. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2913763.
  2. M. Popov, R. P. P. Smeets, L. van der Sluis, H. de Herdt and J. Declercq, Experimental and Theoretical Analysis of Vacuum Circuit Breaker Prestrike Effect on a Transformer, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 24, 2009. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRD.2009.2013383.
Chenfan Electric

Direct coordination

Start a conversation.

A drawing, a material requirement, or a project to discuss.

Send drawing