Chenfan Electric
EN
Send drawing

ARTICLETechnical article

Ageing Products or Moisture? Design the Dielectric Comparison

  • Chenfan Power

An altered dielectric curve does not identify its chemical cause. Moisture, dissolved ionic species, paper degradation products and temperature can affect conduction or relaxation. Assigning the whole change to water needs evidence beyond a fit residual. [1]

Ageing Products or Moisture? Design the Dielectric Comparison: technical review table
First article table, reproduced without adding or changing values. See the article for assumptions and application boundaries.

Use controls that separate the variables

ComparisonVariable being examinedControl required
Same material with different water contentMoisture contributionComparable ageing, impregnation and temperature
Different ageing with matched moistureAgeing-related contributionWater measurement, liquid and geometry
Changed liquid with comparable paperLiquid conduction and impregnation effectsSampling, chemistry and conditioning history
Before and after dryingCombined processing changeTemperature and any simultaneous oil treatment

Do not treat one laboratory trend as universal

Oil acidity and other chemical measurements can supply independent context, but one oil number does not uniquely identify the condition of every paper region. Relate each sample to its material, timing and representativeness.

Arsad and co-authors discuss how ageing/contamination changes oil solubility and polar species. Keep independent water and chemical observations beside the dielectric result; one fitted moisture parameter cannot separate all contributing material changes. [2]

Check a non-moisture conductance change

Assumptions at 20 °C: an ideal parallel dielectric model at 1 Hz has fixed capacitance 1 nF, while conductance rises from 0.1 to 0.2 nS. Independent representative paper sampling is assumed to show unchanged dry-basis water at 1.5%. Tanδ = G/(2πfC) rises from 0.01592 to 0.03183, doubling despite the assumed unchanged water condition. Reject a moisture-only explanation for this controlled comparison; examine liquid conductivity, chemistry and model completeness with the matched material samples. Neither the circuit calculation nor an oil-acidity result alone proves which ageing process produced the extra conductance. [1][2]

References

  1. IEEE, IEEE C57.161-2018, IEEE Guide for Dielectric Frequency Response Test.
  2. S. R. Arsad et al., Water Content in Transformer Insulation System: A Review on the Detection and Quantification Methods, Energies 16, 1920, 2023. DOI: 10.3390/en16041920.
Chenfan Electric

Direct coordination

Start a conversation.

A drawing, a material requirement, or a project to discuss.

Send drawing