Chenfan Electric
EN
Send drawing

ARTICLETechnical article

Loss of Excitation: Tracking GSU Current and Voltage

  • Chenfan Power

When a generator loses excitation, falling active power does not guarantee falling GSU current. The machine may absorb reactive power from the system while its rotor and terminal voltage evolve. The transformer responds to the current through its actual connection, not to the MW trend alone. Set the general power-transformer specification under IEC 60076-1 [1].

For a balanced, slowly varying portion of the event, I = √(P² + Q²)/(√3 V). With P in watts, Q in vars and V in line-to-line RMS volts, the result is amperes. Apply it to time-aligned measurements at the same terminal. During rapid or unbalanced transients, use recorded phase currents and the appropriate dynamic model.

Loss of Excitation: Tracking GSU Current and Voltage: technical review table
First article table, reproduced without adding or changing values. See the article for assumptions and application boundaries.

Separate the event into observable intervals

IntervalRelevant evidenceGSU interpretation
Excitation disturbance beginsField quantities, terminal voltage, instantaneous currentInitial transient cannot be inferred from steady P–Q alone
Reactive absorption developsSigned Q, P and RMS voltageCurrent may rise through larger apparent power or lower voltage
Rotor angle departsSpeed, angle estimate and power oscillationsCheck peak and cyclic current separately
Protection or isolation actsBreaker times and final source pathsIdentify which transformer windings remain energized

These are interpretive intervals rather than a promised sequence. Their duration and even their presence depend on the generator, network strength, protection and controls. Do not substitute a generic timeline for the plant’s event record.

A simple counterexample to the MW assumption

Assume balanced 50 Hz points on one power base: initially P = 0.8 pu, Q = 0 and V = 1.00 pu, giving current 0.800 pu. Later P = 0.6 pu, Q = −0.7 pu and V = 0.90 pu give current √(0.6² + 0.7²)/0.90 = 1.024 pu, 28.05% higher despite lower MW. Use the later measured current and its duration in transformer duty assessment; the arithmetic does not establish permission for loss-of-excitation operation.

Do not combine generator and transformer limits

The generator’s loss-of-excitation protection addresses machine and system consequences. Transformer thermal and mechanical checks use the current waveform, duration and cooling condition. A generator relay setting is therefore not a transformer overload curve.

For a post-event review, plot terminal voltage, P, Q and each phase current on one clock. Add the generator and grid breaker transitions. Check transformer currents before discussing thermal recovery. If only slow supervisory data exist, state that short peaks and the early transient remain unresolved rather than reconstructing them from a low-resolution MW record.

For mineral-oil equipment, relate the loading assessment to operating temperature and thermal ageing [2].

References

  1. IEC, IEC 60076-1:2011, Power transformers – Part 1: General.
  2. IEC, IEC 60076-7:2018, Power transformers – Part 7: Loading guide for mineral-oil-immersed power transformers.
Chenfan Electric

Direct coordination

Start a conversation.

A drawing, a material requirement, or a project to discuss.

Send drawing