Chenfan Electric
EN
Send drawing

ARTICLETechnical article

Spacer Drying Shrinkage and Axial Preload

  • Chenfan Power

Spacer force and dimensions must be compared at defined material and loading states. Pressboard compression data show nonlinear response and loading-history effects. [1] Separate drying-related dimensional change from mechanical seating before using either to predict axial preload; the clamp and restraint system determine the force response.

Record dimensions in defined wet and dry states under a stated measuring load. Identify material direction, spacer position and whether the measurement represents individual parts or a complete stack. An unloaded coupon height cannot be inserted directly into a loaded winding model.

Spacer Drying Shrinkage and Axial Preload: technical review table
First article table, reproduced without adding or changing values. See the article for assumptions and application boundaries.

Follow the chain from material to force

StepEvidenceDistinction
Material dimensionMoisture, direction, temperature and loadHygroscopic change versus mechanical compression
Stack heightActual spacer/contact sequenceAccumulated shrinkage versus seating
Clamping travelSpring, tie-rod or rigid restraint responseAvailable compensation movement
Preload after processQualified force or displacement evidenceCalculated expectation versus verified state

A linear stiffness estimate is only a screen

For a linear restraint with effective stiffness k, shortening Δh changes preload by approximately kΔh in the specified force-releasing arrangement. Use k in N/m and Δh in metres. Bolt/member compliance and the actual load path determine the effective stiffness; contact opening and nonlinear spacers need a fuller model. [2]

A spring arrangement may maintain force over some travel, while a rigidly fixed geometry can lose compression after shrinkage. Neither behavior should be assumed from the word “clamped.”

Retain the measured loaded-state height and force together, so that a dimension change cannot be interpreted using an incompatible restraint or free-coupon state.

Translate spacer settlement into restraint force

Assumptions: effective linear restraint stiffness is 25 kN/mm, the relevant loaded stack shortens 0.6 mm, initial force is 60 kN and the design requires at least 50 kN after processing. Force loss is 25 × 0.6 = 15 kN, leaving 45 kN, deficient by 5 kN. Hold clamp release and verify the actual nonlinear force/travel state against the design; unloaded spacer shrinkage cannot establish this result.

References

  1. C. Oria et al., Experimental dataset on the compressive mechanical properties of high-density pressboard used in power transformers spacers, Data in Brief 50, 109471, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109471.
  2. R. T. Barrett, Fastener Design Manual, NASA Reference Publication 1228, 1990.
Chenfan Electric

Direct coordination

Start a conversation.

A drawing, a material requirement, or a project to discuss.

Send drawing