Chenfan Electric
EN
Send drawing

ARTICLETechnical article

Magnetic Pull and Preload Between Reactor Segments

  • Chenfan Power

Core segments across a reactor gap attract magnetically. Assembly preload and operating magnetic pull act through spacers, tie rods and supports, but their effects depend on the mechanical arrangement. Adding their magnitudes without a free-body diagram can assign the wrong load to a component. [1]

Draw one segment and every force acting on it. Include spacer compression, tie-rod tension, support reaction and magnetic attraction. Identify which contacts are unilateral: they can carry compression but cannot carry tension when separated.

Magnetic Pull and Preload Between Reactor Segments: technical review table
First article table, reproduced without adding or changing values. See the article for assumptions and application boundaries.

Record loads by path and state

ElementInitial stateOperating question
Gap spacerCompression from assemblyMaximum pressure and possible loss of contact
Tie rodPre-tensionHow geometry redistributes tension during pull
Segment supportStatic support reactionCyclic load and permitted movement
InterfaceContact area and friction assumptionOpening, slip or local pressure concentration

Separate mean and cyclic magnetic force

For an ideal normal field in a nonmagnetic gap, p = B²/(2μ₀). A sinusoidal 50 Hz field gives a mean pull plus a 100 Hz component. Integrate the actual face field; fringing and tilt can concentrate pressure. [1]

For the specified closed linear rod/member joint, let C = krod/(krod + kspacer). An inward closing load P reduces rod tension by CP and increases spacer compression by (1−C)P until the assumed contact model changes. [2]

Compare magnetic pull with the preload path

Assumptions: B = 1.0 sin(2π50t) T is uniform and normal over 0.010 m²; μ₀ ≈ 4π×10⁻⁷ H/m. Peak pull is 3.979 kN. A closed linear joint starts with 3.0 kN rod tension and equal spacer compression, with stiffness fraction C = 0.25. At peak pull, rod tension is 3 − 0.25×3.979 = 2.005 kN; spacer compression is 3 + 0.75×3.979 = 5.984 kN. The spacer exceeds an assumed 5.5 kN ceiling by 0.484 kN. Hold that spacer/load-path assignment; the magnetic force is not subtracted from every preload. [1] [2]

References

  1. H. B. Duc, T. P. Minh, T. P. Anh and V. D. Quoc, A Novel Approach for the Modeling of Electromagnetic Forces in Air-Gap Shunt Reactors, Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research 12, 8223–8227, 2022. DOI: 10.48084/etasr.4692.
  2. R. T. Barrett, Fastener Design Manual, NASA Reference Publication 1228, 1990.
Chenfan Electric

Direct coordination

Start a conversation.

A drawing, a material requirement, or a project to discuss.

Send drawing